Wednesday, January 11, 2017

The full transcript of President Obama's farewell address


Here is the text of the farewell address President Obama delivered Tuesday in Chicago
"It’s good to be home.  My fellow Americans, Michelle and I have been so touched by all the well-wishes we’ve received over the past few weeks.  But tonight it’s my turn to say thanks.  Whether we’ve seen eye-to-eye or rarely agreed at all, my conversations with you, the American people – in living rooms and schools; at farms and on factory floors; at diners and on distant outposts – are what have kept me honest, kept me inspired, and kept me going.  Every day, I learned from you.  You made me a better president, and you made me a better man.
I first came to Chicago when I was in my early 20s, still trying to figure out who I was; still searching for a purpose to my life.  It was in neighborhoods not far from here where I began working with church groups in the shadows of closed steel mills.  It was on these streets where I witnessed the power of faith, and the quiet dignity of working people in the face of struggle and loss.  This is where I learned that change only happens when ordinary people get involved, get engaged, and come together to demand it. 
After eight years as your president, I still believe that.  And it’s not just my belief.  It’s the beating heart of our American idea – our bold experiment in self-government. 
It’s the conviction that we are all created equal, endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights, among them life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
It’s the insistence that these rights, while self-evident, have never been self-executing; that we, the people, through the instrument of our democracy, can form a more perfect union.
This is the great gift our Founders gave us.  The freedom to chase our individual dreams through our sweat, toil, and imagination – and the imperative to strive together as well, to achieve a greater good.
For 240 years, our nation’s call to citizenship has given work and purpose to each new generation.  It’s what led patriots to choose republic over tyranny, pioneers to trek west, slaves to brave that makeshift railroad to freedom.  It’s what pulled immigrants and refugees across oceans and the Rio Grande, pushed women to reach for the ballot, powered workers to organize.  It’s why GIs gave their lives at Omaha Beach and Iwo Jima; Iraq and Afghanistan – and why men and women from Selma to Stonewall were prepared to give theirs as well. 
So that’s what we mean when we say America is exceptional.  Not that our nation has been flawless from the start, but that we have shown the capacity to change, and make life better for those who follow. 
Yes, our progress has been uneven.  The work of democracy has always been hard, contentious and sometimes bloody.  For every two steps forward, it often feels we take one step back.  But the long sweep of America has been defined by forward motion, a constant widening of our founding creed to embrace all, and not just some.
If I had told you eight years ago that America would reverse a great recession, reboot our auto industry, and unleash the longest stretch of job creation in our history…if I had told you that we would open up a new chapter with the Cuban people, shut down Iran’s nuclear weapons program without firing a shot, and take out the mastermind of 9/11…if I had told you that we would win marriage equality, and secure the right to health insurance for another 20 million of our fellow citizens – you might have said our sights were set a little too high.
But that’s what we did.  That’s what you did.  You were the change.  You answered people’s hopes, and because of you, by almost every measure, America is a better, stronger place than it was when we started.
In 10 days, the world will witness a hallmark of our democracy:  the peaceful transfer of power from one freely elected president to the next.  I committed to President-elect Trump that my administration would ensure the smoothest possible transition, just as President Bush did for me.  Because it’s up to all of us to make sure our government can help us meet the many challenges we still face.
We have what we need to do so.  After all, we remain the wealthiest, most powerful, and most respected nation on Earth.  Our youth and drive, our diversity and openness, our boundless capacity for risk and reinvention mean that the future should be ours.
But that potential will be realized only if our democracy works.  Only if our politics reflects the decency of the our people.  Only if all of us, regardless of our party affiliation or particular interest, help restore the sense of common purpose that we so badly need right now.
·         That’s what I want to focus on tonight – the state of our democracy.
Understand, democracy does not require uniformity.  Our founders quarreled and compromised, and expected us to do the same. But they knew that democracy does require a basic sense of solidarity – the idea that for all our outward differences, we are all in this together; that we rise or fall as one.
There have been moments throughout our history that threatened to rupture that solidarity.  The beginning of this century has been one of those times.  A shrinking world, growing inequality; demographic change and the specter of terrorism – these forces haven’t just tested our security and prosperity, but our democracy as well.  And how we meet these challenges to our democracy will determine our ability to educate our kids, and create good jobs, and protect our homeland. 
In other words, it will determine our future.
Our democracy won’t work without a sense that everyone has economic opportunity.  Today, the economy is growing again; wages, incomes, home values, and retirement accounts are rising again; poverty is falling again.  The wealthy are paying a fairer share of taxes even as the stock market shatters records.  The unemployment rate is near a ten-year low.  The uninsured rate has never, ever been lower.  Health care costs are rising at the slowest rate in fifty years.  And if anyone can put together a plan that is demonstrably better than the improvements we’ve made to our health care system – that covers as many people at less cost – I will publicly support it. 
That, after all, is why we serve – to make people’s lives better, not worse. 
But for all the real progress we’ve made, we know it’s not enough.  Our economy doesn’t work as well or grow as fast when a few prosper at the expense of a growing middle class.  But stark inequality is also corrosive to our democratic principles.  While the top one percent has amassed a bigger share of wealth and income, too many families, in inner cities and rural counties, have been left behind – the laid-off factory worker; the waitress and health care worker who struggle to pay the bills – convinced that the game is fixed against them, that their government only serves the interests of the powerful – a recipe for more cynicism and polarization in our politics. 
There are no quick fixes to this long-term trend.  I agree that our trade should be fair and not just free.  But the next wave of economic dislocation won’t come from overseas.  It will come from the relentless pace of automation that makes many good, middle-class jobs obsolete.
And so we must forge a new social compact – to guarantee all our kids the education they need; to give workers the power to unionize for better wages; to update the social safety net to reflect the way we live now and make more reforms to the tax code so corporations and individuals who reap the most from the new economy don’t avoid their obligations to the country that’s made their success possible.  We can argue about how to best achieve these goals.  But we can’t be complacent about the goals themselves.  For if we don’t create opportunity for all people, the disaffection and division that has stalled our progress will only sharpen in years to come.
There’s a second threat to our democracy – one as old as our nation itself.  After my election, there was talk of a post-racial America.  Such a vision, however well-intended, was never realistic.  For race remains a potent and often divisive force in our society.  I’ve lived long enough to know that race relations are better than they were ten, or twenty, or thirty years ago – you can see it not just in statistics, but in the attitudes of young Americans across the political spectrum.
But we’re not where we need to be.  All of us have more work to do.  After all, if every economic issue is framed as a struggle between a hardworking white middle class and undeserving minorities, then workers of all shades will be left fighting for scraps while the wealthy withdraw further into their private enclaves.  If we decline to invest in the children of immigrants, just because they don’t look like us, we diminish the prospects of our own children – because those brown kids will represent a larger share of America’s workforce.  And our economy doesn’t have to be a zero-sum game.  Last year, incomes rose for all races, all age groups, for men and for women. 
Going forward, we must uphold laws against discrimination – in hiring, in housing, in education and the criminal justice system.  That’s what our Constitution and highest ideals require.  But laws alone won’t be enough.  Hearts must change.  If our democracy is to work in this increasingly diverse nation, each one of us must try to heed the advice of one of the great characters in American fiction, Atticus Finch, who said “You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view…until you climb into his skin and walk around in it.”
For blacks and other minorities, it means tying our own struggles for justice to the challenges that a lot of people in this country face – the refugee, the immigrant, the rural poor, the transgender American, and also the middle-aged white man who from the outside may seem like he’s got all the advantages, but who’s seen his world upended by economic, cultural, and technological change. 
For white Americans, it means acknowledging that the effects of slavery and Jim Crow didn’t suddenly vanish in the ‘60s; that when minority groups voice discontent, they’re not just engaging in reverse racism or practicing political correctness; that when they wage peaceful protest, they’re not demanding special treatment, but the equal treatment our Founders promised. 
For native-born Americans, it means reminding ourselves that the stereotypes about immigrants today were said, almost word for word, about the Irish, Italians, and Poles.  America wasn’t weakened by the presence of these newcomers; they embraced this nation’s creed, and it was strengthened. 
So regardless of the station we occupy; we have to try harder; to start with the premise that each of our fellow citizens loves this country just as much as we do; that they value hard work and family like we do; that their children are just as curious and hopeful and worthy of love as our own. 
None of this is easy.  For too many of us, it’s become safer to retreat into our own bubbles, whether in our neighborhoods or college campuses or places of worship or our social media feeds, surrounded by people who look like us and share the same political outlook and never challenge our assumptions.  The rise of naked partisanship, increasing economic and regional stratification, the splintering of our media into a channel for every taste – all this makes this great sorting seem natural, even inevitable.  And increasingly, we become so secure in our bubbles that we accept only information, whether true or not, that fits our opinions, instead of basing our opinions on the evidence that’s out there.
This trend represents a third threat to our democracy.  Politics is a battle of ideas; in the course of a healthy debate, we’ll prioritize different goals, and the different means of reaching them.  But without some common baseline of facts; without a willingness to admit new information, and concede that your opponent is making a fair point, and that science and reason matter, we’ll keep talking past each other, making common ground and compromise impossible. 
Isn’t that part of what makes politics so dispiriting?  How can elected officials rage about deficits when we propose to spend money on preschool for kids, but not when we’re cutting taxes for corporations?  How do we excuse ethical lapses in our own party, but pounce when the other party does the same thing?  It’s not just dishonest, this selective sorting of the facts; it’s self-defeating.  Because as my mother used to tell me, reality has a way of catching up with you. 
Take the challenge of climate change.  In just eight years, we’ve halved our dependence on foreign oil, doubled our renewable energy, and led the world to an agreement that has the promise to save this planet.  But without bolder action, our children won’t have time to debate the existence of climate change; they’ll be busy dealing with its effects: environmental disasters, economic disruptions, and waves of climate refugees seeking sanctuary. 
Now, we can and should argue about the best approach to the problem.  But to simply deny the problem not only betrays future generations; it betrays the essential spirit of innovation and practical problem-solving that guided our Founders.
It’s that spirit, born of the Enlightenment, that made us an economic powerhouse – the spirit that took flight at Kitty Hawk and Cape Canaveral; the spirit that that cures disease and put a computer in every pocket. 
It’s that spirit – a faith in reason, and enterprise, and the primacy of right over might, that allowed us to resist the lure of fascism and tyranny during the Great Depression, and build a post-World War II order with other democracies, an order based not just on military power or national affiliations but on principles – the rule of law, human rights, freedoms of religion, speech, assembly, and an independent press.
That order is now being challenged – first by violent fanatics who claim to speak for Islam; more recently by autocrats in foreign capitals who see free markets, open democracies, and civil society itself as a threat to their power.  The peril each poses to our democracy is more far-reaching than a car bomb or a missile.  It represents the fear of change; the fear of people who look or speak or pray differently; a contempt for the rule of law that holds leaders accountable; an intolerance of dissent and free thought; a belief that the sword or the gun or the bomb or propaganda machine is the ultimate arbiter of what’s true and what’s right.
Because of the extraordinary courage of our men and women in uniform, and the intelligence officers, law enforcement, and diplomats who support them, no foreign terrorist organization has successfully planned and executed an attack on our homeland these past eight years; and although Boston and Orlando remind us of how dangerous radicalization can be, our law enforcement agencies are more effective and vigilant than ever.  We’ve taken out tens of thousands of terrorists – including Osama bin Laden.  The global coalition we’re leading against ISIL has taken out their leaders, and taken away about half their territory.  ISIL will be destroyed, and no one who threatens America will ever be safe.  To all who serve, it has been the honor of my lifetime to be your Commander-in-Chief.
But protecting our way of life requires more than our military.  Democracy can buckle when we give in to fear.  So just as we, as citizens, must remain vigilant against external aggression, we must guard against a weakening of the values that make us who we are.  That’s why, for the past eight years, I’ve worked to put the fight against terrorism on a firm legal footing.  That’s why we’ve ended torture, worked to close Gitmo, and reform our laws governing surveillance to protect privacy and civil liberties.  That’s why I reject discrimination against Muslim Americans.  That’s why we cannot withdraw from global fights – to expand democracy, and human rights, women’s rights, and LGBT rights – no matter how imperfect our efforts, no matter how expedient ignoring such values may seem.  For the fight against extremism and intolerance and sectarianism are of a piece with the fight against authoritarianism and nationalist aggression.  If the scope of freedom and respect for the rule of law shrinks around the world, the likelihood of war within and between nations increases, and our own freedoms will eventually be threatened.
So let’s be vigilant, but not afraid.  ISIL will try to kill innocent people.  But they cannot defeat America unless we betray our Constitution and our principles in the fight.  Rivals like Russia or China cannot match our influence around the world – unless we give up what we stand for, and turn ourselves into just another big country that bullies smaller neighbors.
Which brings me to my final point – our democracy is threatened whenever we take it for granted.  All of us, regardless of party, should throw ourselves into the task of rebuilding our democratic institutions.  When voting rates are some of the lowest among advanced democracies, we should make it easier, not harder, to vote.  When trust in our institutions is low, we should reduce the corrosive influence of money in our politics, and insist on the principles of transparency and ethics in public service.  When Congress is dysfunctional, we should draw our districts to encourage politicians to cater to common sense and not rigid extremes.
And all of this depends on our participation; on each of us accepting the responsibility of citizenship, regardless of which way the pendulum of power swings. 
Our Constitution is a remarkable, beautiful gift.  But it’s really just a piece of parchment.  It has no power on its own.  We, the people, give it power – with our participation, and the choices we make.  Whether or not we stand up for our freedoms.  Whether or not we respect and enforce the rule of law.  America is no fragile thing.  But the gains of our long journey to freedom are not assured.
In his own farewell address, George Washington wrote that self-government is the underpinning of our safety, prosperity, and liberty, but “from different causes and from different quarters much pains will be taken…to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth;” that we should preserve it with “jealous anxiety;” that we should reject “the first dawning of every attempt to alienate any portion of our country from the rest or to enfeeble the sacred ties” that make us one.
We weaken those ties when we allow our political dialogue to become so corrosive that people of good character are turned off from public service; so coarse with rancor that Americans with whom we disagree are not just misguided, but somehow malevolent.  We weaken those ties when we define some of us as more American than others; when we write off the whole system as inevitably corrupt, and blame the leaders we elect without examining our own role in electing them.
It falls to each of us to be those anxious, jealous guardians of our democracy; to embrace the joyous task we’ve been given to continually try to improve this great nation of ours.  Because for all our outward differences, we all share the same proud title:  Citizen.
Ultimately, that’s what our democracy demands.  It needs you.  Not just when there’s an election, not just when your own narrow interest is at stake, but over the full span of a lifetime.  If you’re tired of arguing with strangers on the internet, try to talk with one in real life.  If something needs fixing, lace up your shoes and do some organizing.  If you’re disappointed by your elected officials, grab a clipboard, get some signatures, and run for office yourself.  Show up.  Dive in.  Persevere.  Sometimes you’ll win.  Sometimes you’ll lose.  Presuming a reservoir of goodness in others can be a risk, and there will be times when the process disappoints you.  But for those of us fortunate enough to have been a part of this work, to see it up close, let me tell you, it can energize and inspire.  And more often than not, your faith in America – and in Americans – will be confirmed. 
Mine sure has been.  Over the course of these eight years, I’ve seen the hopeful faces of young graduates and our newest military officers.  I’ve mourned with grieving families searching for answers, and found grace in Charleston church.  I’ve seen our scientists help a paralyzed man regain his sense of touch, and our wounded warriors walk again.  I’ve seen our doctors and volunteers rebuild after earthquakes and stop pandemics in their tracks.  I’ve seen the youngest of children remind us of our obligations to care for refugees, to work in peace, and above all to look out for each other.
That faith I placed all those years ago, not far from here, in the power of ordinary Americans to bring about change – that faith has been rewarded in ways I couldn’t possibly have imagined.  I hope yours has, too.  Some of you here tonight or watching at home were there with us in 2004, in 2008, in 2012 – and maybe you still can’t believe we pulled this whole thing off. 
You’re not the only ones.  Michelle – for the past twenty-five years, you’ve been not only my wife and mother of my children, but my best friend.  You took on a role you didn’t ask for and made it your own with grace and grit and style and good humor.  You made the White House a place that belongs to everybody.  And a new generation sets its sights higher because it has you as a role model.  You’ve made me proud.  You’ve made the country proud.
Malia and Sasha, under the strangest of circumstances, you have become two amazing young women, smart and beautiful, but more importantly, kind and thoughtful and full of passion.  You wore the burden of years in the spotlight so easily.  Of all that I’ve done in my life, I’m most proud to be your dad. 
To Joe Biden, the scrappy kid from Scranton who became Delaware’s favorite son:  you were the first choice I made as a nominee, and the best.  Not just because you have been a great Vice President, but because in the bargain, I gained a brother.  We love you and Jill like family, and your friendship has been one of the great joys of our life.
To my remarkable staff:  For eight years – and for some of you, a whole lot more – I’ve drawn from your energy, and tried to reflect back what you displayed every day: heart, and character, and idealism.  I’ve watched you grow up, get married, have kids, and start incredible new journeys of your own.  Even when times got tough and frustrating, you never let Washington get the better of you.  The only thing that makes me prouder than all the good we’ve done is the thought of all the remarkable things you’ll achieve from here.
And to all of you out there – every organizer who moved to an unfamiliar town and kind family who welcomed them in, every volunteer who knocked on doors, every young person who cast a ballot for the first time, every American who lived and breathed the hard work of change – you are the best supporters and organizers anyone could hope for, and I will forever be grateful.  Because yes, you changed the world.
That’s why I leave this stage tonight even more optimistic about this country than I was when we started.  Because I know our work has not only helped so many Americans; it has inspired so many Americans – especially so many young people out there – to believe you can make a difference; to hitch your wagon to something bigger than yourselves.  This generation coming up – unselfish, altruistic, creative, patriotic – I’ve seen you in every corner of the country.  You believe in a fair, just, inclusive America; you know that constant change has been America’s hallmark, something not to fear but to embrace, and you are willing to carry this hard work of democracy forward.  You’ll soon outnumber any of us, and I believe as a result that the future is in good hands.
My fellow Americans, it has been the honor of my life to serve you.  I won’t stop; in fact, I will be right there with you, as a citizen, for all my days that remain.  For now, whether you’re young or young at heart, I do have one final ask of you as your President – the same thing I asked when you took a chance on me eight years ago.
I am asking you to believe.  Not in my ability to bring about change – but in yours. 
I am asking you to hold fast to that faith written into our founding documents; that idea whispered by slaves and abolitionists; that spirit sung by immigrants and homesteaders and those who marched for justice; that creed reaffirmed by those who planted flags from foreign battlefields to the surface of the moon; a creed at the core of every American whose story is not yet written:
Yes We Can. 
Yes We Did. 
Yes We Can.
Thank you.  God bless you.  And may God continue to bless the United States of America.”

Friday, January 6, 2017

HAÏTI HUMILIEE - LE PEUPLE HAÏTIEN HUMILIÉ.

MES POINTS SUR LES I
DE MICHELE BENNETT DUVALIER
Michele Bennett Duvalier

Hier était un triste jour pour notre pays.
Un Sénateur élu de la République a été arrêté ou devrais-je dire qu'il a été kidnappé par la DEA (Drugs Enforcement Administration).  Le Sénateur Guy Philippe a été arrêté à son arrivée devant les locaux d'une radio située a PetionVille.


Que Guy Philippe fasse l'objet d'un mandat d'arrêt de la Police Haïtienne et d'un mandat d'arrêt de la DEA, là n'est pas la question.

Mais à la veille de la rentrée Parlementaire prévue pour lundi 9 prochain, on est en droit de se poser des questions sur les conditions de son arrestation et sur sa déportation vers les USA le soir même.

Voilà un homme, recherché par la police Haïtienne et la toute puissante DEA qui malgré ces deux mandats d'arrêt, a reçu la bénédiction du CEP et a mené sa campagne électorale depuis plus de quinze mois dans toute la Grand-Anse sans jamais être inquiéter. On l'a même vu faire campagne aux côtés du Président élu Jovenel Moise a qui il a apporté la victoire de la Grand-Anse (voir photo). On l'a encore vu et entendu, donnant des interviews à la presse locale et internationale lors du passage du cyclone Matthew dans le Grand Sud. On a tous vu des images de Guy Philippe portant secours aux sinistrés de sa ville de Pestel et des environs.

Pourquoi avoir attendu après le résultat des élections pour l'arrêter et le déporter? Pourquoi ce coup d'éclat à la veille de la rentrée Parlementaire? Pourquoi le Cep a-t-il accepté son dossier de candidature? Pourquoi cette arrestation n'a pas été faite avant ou pendant la campagne électorale? Ou avant le résultat des élections! Pourquoi HIER? Le Sénateur Guy Philippe a même reçu son certificat du CEP hier dans la matinée. Ce qui veut dire qu'il était couvert par l'immunité parlementaire.

Quid du mandat d'arrêt national? Ne prévaut-il pas sur le mandat d'arrêt international?
Alors Pourquoi hier?  Est-ce un message fort envoyé par les USA au nouveau Président élu et à son futur Gouvernement? Le nettoyage des écuries d'Augias a-t-il commencé? Le prochain sera qui?


Hier soir, on a tous vu la vidéo montrant les images déplorables du Président du Sénat, Ronald Lareche, bousculé et malmené par des agents encagoulés de la PNH, l'empêchant d'accéder dans les locaux ou se trouvaient le Sénateur Guy Philippe. Quel triste spectacle!
On a tous vu des images du puissant Sénateur Youri Latortue arrivant essoufflé à la rescousse de son confrère devant les locaux de la Radio Scoop FM. Mais trop tard. Les carottes étaient déjà cuites pour Guy Philippe.


Nos Poules de Luxe du Senat étaient impuissantes hier devant les cowboys américains qui ont investi l'aéroport international et ont fait monter à bord d'un petit avion affrété spécialement pour le transport du détenu Guy Philippe, menotté dont le visage avait perdu le sourire qu'il affichait depuis sa victoire aux élections.

Que reste-il de notre dignité ? Depuis 30 ans Haiti est devenue un énième département américain, incapable de vivre sans l'aide étrangère. Sommes-nous devenus un sous-peuple? On vit sous les dicktats des grandes puissances étrangères. Nous sommes devenu les poubelles des USA.

Un traité a été signé entre les USA et le Gouvernement de l'ancien Président Rene Preval pour mettre fin au traffic illicite de drogue. Ce traité accorde tous les droits aux Sheriffs américains.

Mais le Sénateur Guy Philippe a été arrêté et deporté en étant couvert par l'immunité parlementaire. Guy Philippe est-il un citoyen américain? Détient-il un passeport américain? Comme c'est le cas de beaucoup de ceux qui nous gouvernent.
Ce qui est arrivé hier, n'est nullement anodin et mérite réflexion de la part de la classe politique dans son ensemble.


Souvenez vous du Président Noriega qui croupit dans une prison américaine après avoir été arrêté et déporté aux USA.

Nous avons depuis 30 ans, perdu HONNEUR ET RESPECT. J'aimerais vous citer une phrase tirée de notre Acte d'Independance, écrite par Boisrond Tonnerre, Secrétaire de Jean Jacques Dessalines, le 1er Janvier 1804: "Je jure enfin de poursuivre à jamais les traîtres et les ennemis de ton indépendance."

Messieurs du Gouvernement actuel et Président élu, Honorables du Sénat, le peuple haïtien attends des réponses à toutes ces questions.
Haiti humiliée. Haiti vilipendée.

"Qu'avez-vous fait de mon Pays?" JC Duvalier.
Michele Bennett Duvalier
Le 6 Janvier 2017

Paris, France

NEWS RELEASE: HAITIAN NATIONAL CHARGED WITH INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS AND MONEY LAUNDERING CONSPIRACY

U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of Florida
99 N.E. 4 Street
Miami, FL 33132
(305) 961-9001
Public Information Officer:
Sarah Schall, Special Counsel
(305) 961-9377
Sarah.schall@usdoj.gov

NEWS RELEASE:
HAITIAN NATIONAL CHARGED WITH INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS AND MONEY LAUNDERING CONSPIRACY
Guy Philippe during his first appearance
in front of the American Judge in Miami
Wifredo A. Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Assistant Attorney General Leslie R. Caldwell of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, Adolphus P. Wright, Special Agent in Charge, United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Miami Field Division, and Kelly R. Jackson, Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI), Miami Field Office announced that the indictment against Guy Philippe, 48, of Haiti, was unsealed this morning in the Southern District of Florida.  

Philippe was indicted in 2005 on one count of conspiracy to import narcotics; one count of conspiracy to launder monetary instruments and engage in monetary transactions in property derived from unlawful activity; and one substantive count of engaging in monetary transactions derived from unlawful activity.  This afternoon, Philippe was ordered held without bond during an initial hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry L. Garber of the Southern District of Florida.  Philippe’s arraignment hearing is scheduled for January 13, 2017.

According to the indictment, from approximately 1997 through 2001, Philippe conspired with others to import more than five kilograms of cocaine into the United States.  From approximately June 1999 through April 2003, Philippe also allegedly conspired with others to engage in money laundering to conceal their participation in criminal activity, including narcotics trafficking.  The indictment alleges that in 2000, Philippe transferred a $112,000 check through a financial institution, affecting interstate and foreign commerce, that included monies derived from the illicit drug trafficking enterprise. 
An indictment is merely an allegation and a defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

The DEA and IRS-CI investigated the case.  The Criminal Division’s Office of International Affairs, U.S. Marshals Service Fugitive Task Force, U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Miami Office of Field Operations and the Haitian Government, including the Haitian Ministry of Justice, Haitian National Police and La Brigade de Lutte contre le Trafic de Stupéfiants (BLTS), provided assistance in this matter.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Lynn M. Kirkpatrick and Andy R. Camacho of the Southern District of Florida and Senior Trial Counsel Mark A. Irish of the Criminal Division’s Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section are prosecuting the case.

This case is the result of the ongoing efforts by the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) a partnership that brings together the combined expertise and unique abilities of federal, state and local law enforcement agencies.  The principal mission of the OCDETF program is to identify, disrupt, dismantle and prosecute high level members of drug trafficking, weapons trafficking and money laundering organizations and enterprises.

A copy of this press release may be found on the website of the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida at www.usdoj.gov/usao/fls. Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or on http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

French Translation is available

Video in Creole - about his first appearance in front of the Judge in Miami
A courtesy of Tripotay Lakay

Extradition de l'ex chef rebel et nouveau sénateur élu de la Grand’Anse


Port-au-Prince, jeudi 5 janvier 2017-

Guy Philippe, le nouveau sénateur élu de la Grand'Anse arrêté et extradé...

Guy Philippe durant sa garde à vue
au DCPJ.                                        
L’ex chef rebel et nouveau sénateur élu  de la Grand’Anse vient d’être extradé  à destination des Etats-Unis à bord d’un avion immatriculé au numéro N5888k. Selon les premiers rapports qui nous sont parvenus, Mr Philippe aurait été arrêté vers les 3 heures de l`après-midi, dans la commune de Pétion-Ville, à sa sortie de l`émission “Haiti Débats” animée par Gary  Pierre-Paul Charles sur la radio Scoop FM..
Mr Philippe revenait du Conseil Electoral Provisoire pour prendre son certificat de validation et participait à une émission radiophonique avec le sénateur Saurel Jacynthe sur la radio Scoop FM . Comme le nouvel élu n’a pas encore prêté serment, il ne bénéficie pas encore d’immunité parlementaire selon certains observateurs.
 Au moment où il s’apprêtait à quitter la radio avec ses agents de sécurité, il a été acclamé par ses partisans, parmi lesquels un policier en infiltration l’a pris en dépourvu et l’a maîtrisé. Les autres policiers ont tiré en l’air pour intimider ses agents de sécurité.
Les auditeurs pouvaient même entendre les détonations en direct sur Scoop FM. Un journaliste de cette station qui a assisté à cette scène a affirmé que cette opération menée conjointement par des membres de BLTS et de DCPJ, a provoqué une panique générale à Pétion Ville.
Selon quelques sources,  Guy Philippe faisait l’objet de deux mandats. Le premier émanant de la justice haïtienne et le second de l’agence des Etats-Unis de lutte contre la drogue (DEA).
Un mandat d’amener aurait été émis contre l’ex commissaire de Delmas dans l’affaire de l’attaque du commissariat des Cayes dans la nuit du 15 au 16 juin 2016.
En Haïti, les réactions sont mitigées après cette arrestation de Guy Philippe. Cette arrestation survient 4 jours avant que le nouvel élu au Sénat de la République soit installé. Si Guy Philippe avait déjà prêté serment comme sénateur il aurait bénéficié d’une immunité empêchant son arrestation .
hg
Autre photos et vidéos du reportage

 
 
 
 


Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Le créole source de régression académique

creole-education
Je suis en Haiti où je viens de participer à la Foire Internationale du Livre Haïtien (FILHA). J’ai signé deux titres, particulièrement mon essai « Paracréolistique ». Un condisciple à la fac de génie m’héberge chez lui. Sa femme et ses enfants vivent en dehors d’Haïti, donc il a trouvé un moyen de rendre utile sa grande maison vidée de sa famille en louant l’étage à un couple qui a un garçonnet de neuf ans, enfant unique. Il s’appelle Mesaul. Ses parents sont éducateurs et Mesaul va à une école huppée. Mesaul m’impressionne avec son langage. Un français fluide. Il avait ouvert la barrière de la maison pour laisser entrer la voiture ce qui me causa de le méprendre pour quelqu’un d’autre. Mais je vais tout de suite me demander dans le noir de la coupure d’électricité qui rendait son visage insaisissable qui est ce petit « tonton  qui me pousse » ce bon français. Chez lui, le français a établi sa permanence sur toutes les lèvres…ou presque. Il parle un peu d’anglais aussi. A neuf ans en Haïti, c’est déjà pas mal !
Mesaul n’aime pas le créole. Il me dit que ses camarades de classe ne l’aiment pas non plus. Eux tous manipulent le français admirablement bien et ne voient aucun avantage à parler le créole. Ils parlent le français également à la maison. Il me dit carrément que leur langue est le français même si le créole est leur langue maternelle.
Mesaul en veut au créole, cause selon lui de la chute de sa moyenne à l’école. Dans les classes antérieures où l’on n’enseignait pas le créole, il brillait. Maintenant il n’obtient que sept sur dix, alors que par le passé il en obtenait neuf. Apparemment ses notes en créole on fait dégringoler sa moyenne. Il n’avait pas prêté l’attention qu’il fallait à cette langue qu’on pense être inutile et sa moyenne en fit les frais. Si vous regardez mes carnets des années précédentes, vous verrez que pour toutes les matières, j’obtiens neuf sur dix alors, que le vieux créole (sic) a causé à ma moyenne de baisser. Je lui demande s’il ne sait pas que dire « vieux créole » c’est traduire directement du créole au français, il me dit qu’il ne sait pas mais c’est ainsi qu’il traite le créole, « vieux ». Ecris-tu le créole lui demande-je ? Il répond avec l’intonation que l’on nous connaît des Haïtiens lorsque nous répondons à une question qu’on n’aurait pas du poser: « écrire ! bon je ne parle pas le créole et tu me demandes si je l’écris ?» Il me dit qu’on lui enseigne à l’écrire mais lui il commet trop de fautes.
Je lui demande si ses parents communiquent avec lui en créole et il me répond que non, et ajoute « seulement lorsqu’ils sont en colère contre moi. » Il me dit qu’à l’université il étudiera probablement le droit mais il ne s’est pas encore décidé définitivement pour une discipline. Dans un tribunal ou tout se fait en français, les avocats qui parlent le français depuis leur tendre enfance ont a priori un avantage substantiel sur ceux qui ont trimé durement pour faire l’acquisition de langue dans les classes secondaires. Le droit serait donc un choix judicieux en tenant compte de la situation qui a toujours prévalu chez nous.
Mesaul joue un jeu de vidéo de Football sur son smartphone dépourvu d’une carte SIM. Il marque des buts et son équipe en reçoit aussi. Mais il à l’air de bien maîtriser le jeu. Il n’utilise le smartphone que pour les jeux. Sans un abonnement téléphonique il ne peut aller sur les réseaux sociaux ni naviguer la Toile. Je doute que ses parents lui donneraient la clé du Wi-Fi. Sage mesure de sécurité de ses parents pour son age. Il me dit que sa mère ne lui laisse pas utiliser l’unité lorsqu’elle n’est pas sur son sang (sic). Mesaul reste près de moi au moins une heure, jouant son jeu me posant des questions et moi m’émerveillant de l’accréditation de thèses avancées dans Paracréolistique.
En effet, avec Mesaul le créole est définitivement traité en parent pauvre. Il le traite de « vieux créole ». La compréhension créole du mot vieux dans ce contexte est foncièrement quelque chose de mauvais. Quelque chose qu’il faut mépriser, regarder avec dédain. Le fait que ses parents ne lui parlent qu’en français est déjà une indication qu’ils ne considèrent pas le créole comme une langue à laquelle leur fils devrait prêter trop d’attention. Paradoxal mais c’est la réalité de Port-au-Prince. Cependant leur langage de colère est le créole. Mais ce qui va se passer c’est que ce garçonnet apprend implicitement à haïr le créole qu’il n’entend de ses parents que dans les situations intenses d’anxiété. Dans les bons moments, dans les moments de joie, il entend le français. Lorsqu’il va être puni il entend le créole. Le résultat est catastrophique. Il est hostile au créole, il ne l’apprend pas bien, il commet plein de fautes lorsqu’il l’écrit. Conséquemment cela affecte sa performance à l’école. Pourtant cet enfant avait l’intelligence d’obtenir d’excellentes notes avant son exposition formelle au créole, avant que sa moyenne en dépendait. Avec un effort minimal il aurait put maintenir l’excellente moyenne. Mais, hélas, il est victime d’une mentalité délétère au progrès du pays.
La problématique que la paracréolistique appelle la francisation verbatim, ou analogie francophone affecte son langage. Cette problématique est celle de la traduction littérale d’une phrase ou d’un texte créole en français sans tenir compte du contexte et sans se demander si les mots charrient le même sens sémantique du créole au français[1]. Il parle du « vieux créole » et de sa mère qui n’est « pas sur son sang », ce qui signifie qu’elle est de mauvaise humeur. Ma surprise est quemême Mésaul face à cette problématique. Et pourtant il affirme ne pas bien connaître ce « vieux » créole. Cela pourrait être un mystère. Comment un petit qui ne maîtrise pas le créole, comme il le dit, arrive-t-il avoir tellement de créole en luiqu’il va jusqu’à le franciser verbatim ? A-t-il été « contaminé » par d’autres qui pratiquent cette francisation verbatim ou qui lui ont glissé ces termes ? La réalité est que Mesaul connaît plus de créole qu’il ne le sait. Mesaul est un petit créole et il ne le sait même pas. En ce sens l’attitude de Mesaul est à la limite de ce que la paracréolistique appelle misoïsme, un néologisme qu’elle invente pour traduire une haine injustifiée des siens, de son habitat, de son pays, de tout ce qui se rapporte à ses origines. Mais lui c’est seulement au créole qu’il s’en prend. Mésaul est un gentil garçon, aimable et très serviable. A mille lieues du petit terroriste qui corrige Frankétienne avec virulence le premier jour où l’auteur arrive à l’école, ne parlant que le créole. Nonobstant, les deux garçonnets ont bu à la même source, celle du mépris du créole. L’incident Frankétienne, je le reprends dans la paracréolistique. La sœur Félicienne lui demande son nom en français. Il ne comprend absolument rien de ce qu’elle dit. Le petit terroriste lui lanca: « ti makak, kote w soti ou pa wè si se non w li mande w ». Frankétienne appelle cet incident son acte fondateur.
Je vais laisser une copie de l’essai à ses parents et espère l’introduire lui-même à l’activité paracréolistique. L’essai et été rédigé pour des gens comme lui et ses parents qui ont de fortes compétences orales en créole. Il ne leur faut qu’un effort minuscule pour faire émerger des compétences au niveau lecture et écriture. Cela lui aidera sur plusieurs fronts. Il fera plus d’efforts pour maîtriser l’écriture du créole après avoir cassé le blocage mental de son infériorité. Il jouira du prestige que lui apportera le recouvrement de sa moyenne 9. Il n’utilisera plus l’appellation de vieux pour décrire le créole et sera aussi conscient des écueils de la francisation verbatim.
Au demeurant le créole n'est pas vraiment la source de la régression académique de Mesaul. Il en est lui-même la source. Victime de la mentalité que lui a transmise fidèlement le milieu. Cela est vraiment dommage!

Par : Marc-Arthur Pierre-Louis brb@brbmi.com


Tuesday, December 13, 2016

HAITI: FAILED PRIVATE SECTOR, FAILED STATE!

By Joel Leon
Joel Leon
“The amalgamation of a failed private sector with kidnapping, drug trafficking, bad government constitutes the most important reason that explains Haiti’s failure in its quest to build a nation-state. Unfortunately, the United States government, symbol of nation building, is often on the wrong side of history in Haiti.”



I am not comparing the US economy to Haiti’s considering this country’s long business tradition, and the vast amount of wealth created for the past two centuries. However, I want to stress the responsibility of the private sector in America versus the one operating in Haiti. Sometimes, people straightforwardly ask if there is a private sector in Haiti because there is no evidence that suggests otherwise.


The private sector is “the part of the economy that is not under the government’s control”; it is protected by a bunch of laws that guarantee its growing existence to maturity with only one goal: making profits. In Haiti, there is a concoction of roles. It seems that the private sector, the public sector, and the charities are working together in an evil way to crush the people. I remember right after the earthquake that destroyed Port-Au-Prince, the capital of Haiti, in January12th, 2010, I witnessed the rich people intertwining with the poor for a long period of time to benefit from the humanitarian aid. In some other countries, one would see something different. The rich would provide aid to the vulnerable souls. The most disgusting part remains: after a euphoric poor people-rich people interaction, the economic class, at first, monopolized the free international aid distribution. Later, it sold at an expensive price to the poor the same goods that the latter individuals were morally and legally entitled to.
In addition to profit-making, the private sector is morally obligated to create jobs. Without purchasing power, the potential customers won’t be able to consume and pay their bills. Hence, the consequences will be automatically disastrous even for those who own the means of production. Why? Because there is no consummation! -- Production will be hurt. No profit. This unbalanced equation is contrary to capitalism whose reality, among others, consists of employers making profits at the expense of employees’ labor. One may thusly summarize this reciprocal relationship: no jobs, no profits!

I believe that the Haitian private sector doesn’t get it. Right after the Duvalier’s dynasty’s departure in February 1986, international financial institutions such as the IMF, the World Bank, IDB (Inter-American Development Bank) …tried to impose their view on how to run Haitian finances. In fact, they expected to develop capitalism in Haiti to definitely put an end to feudalism. The only problem is and continues to be that the Haitian economic class has never been ready for such an adventure. Under pressure from the aforementioned institutions, the local government sold the cement and flour companies to the private sector. Just one year after the deal, both businesses closed their doors. Then, follow a shortage of cement and flour. Subsequently, many hundreds of people lost their jobs. Unemployment was rampant. Social unrest created a chronic instability. Worse yet, there is no unemployment benefit in Haiti which could have alleviated the jobless individuals’ burden.
Haiti is a poor country, among others, with 41% unemployment rate, 48% illiteracy rate, and 60% of people living below the poverty line. At the same time, a hand full of 5 families control the entire wealth. I remember talking to an American professor about how many billionaires we have in Haiti. At the beginning, he started to laugh at me. The paradox is that we have several Haitian billionaires. The US government has tried on many occasions to stimulate the private sector in Haiti through many programs such as Food Conservation and Energy Act (HOPE) in 2006; Haitian Hemispheric Opportunity through Partnership Encouragement Act (HOPE II) (2008); in 2010, Haiti Lift Program (HELP). All of these initiatives have been put in place to stimulate foreign investment in Haiti, and to rally the private sector to redeem itself by profiting from those programs those open doors via “Eligibility for duty-free treatment “under the Caribbean Basin trade partnership Act (CBTPA)”. The main goal was to create jobs; the Haitian private sector didn’t seize the opportunity.

The Haitian Diaspora which is sending more than 2 billions of dollars in Haiti each year is not welcome to participate actively in the economic and political process. Those 5 families in command of the economy are hostile to the Diaspora who is trying to invest in Haiti. Yet, “Haitian-Americans are among the most successful immigrant groups in the United States”. Last year, Haiti’s GNP showed a deficit of 2.5 billions of dollars because we exported for 1.029 billion dollars, while we imported for 3.445 billions of dollars. Haitian businessmen operate as a mafia organization. They burn businesses, kidnap family members and shoot people like dogs in the streets if you are not one of them…They monopolize all vital aspects of the economy: from tourism, textile, production, consummation, government and private institutions. At the same time, they are not taking any serious measures to develop the economy to create jobs for the people. They are fiercely against all sorts of competition. They favor monopoly. Customers are totally screwed up.

Now, let’s talk about the dilemma private sector vs. the public sector. Everywhere in the world, nations are developing a public/private partnership to better serve the people and themselves. In Haiti, businessmen own the public sector. The rich maintain their grips on governmental institutions. All of them! There is no balance of power, meaning no accountability to any mischief caused by powerful economic individuals. That’s why they have always supported, financed and corrupted presidential candidates in each election. The last known was taking place on November 20th, 2016. The big business supported the “statu quo” represented by Jovnel Moïse. He is a businessman who is being investigated for money laundering, racketeering, and drug connection by the country’s highest financial court (Cour Supérieure des Comptes known by its acronym CSC). He was handpicked by Michel Martelly himself, the former Haitian president.

Let me tell a true story that happened last year in Haiti. There is a powerful guy named Jacques Kétant. He was arrested in 2003 because his bodyguard went inside of a school attended by US embassy personnel’s children to murder broad daylight a government official. Jacqueline Charles, from Miami Herald, delivered her opinion about Mr. Ketant as follow: “Considered the Pablo Escobar of Haiti, Ketant lived a lavish lifestyle in Haiti, where he was an untouchable kingpin until Aristide gave in to U.S. pressure in 2003 and expelled him. He was soon sentenced to 27 years in prison after pleading guilty to smuggling 30 tons of cocaine from Haiti to the United States.” On August 18th, 2015, US judicial system decided to deport him back to Haiti after serving half of his sentence because the court found him to be cooperative. Many drug dealers have been arrested and sentenced to long prison terms. Upon his return to Haiti, Mr. Kétant was greeted and picked up at the airport by Roro Nelson and Gracia Delva. Mr. Nelson is among former president Michel Martelly’s closest friend for years; some people believe that he was there to welcome Mr. Kétant under Mr. Martelly’s expressed demand. Similarly, Mr. Gracia Delva, an actual member of the parliament, is a deportee from the United States. Delva is about to be a senator very soon. Among other Martelly’s allies known for their anomic activities are: Guy Philippe (pursued by DEA as a fugitive for drug trafficking); Youri Latortue, him also senator, has been involved in drug activities, according to Wikileaks; Joseph Lambert, freshly reelected to senate, also has a drug connection; Willot Joseph, newly elected senator, has been implicated in drug trafficking. The Haitian senate is going to be filled up with a bunch of “drug dealers”.

Additionally, it is noteworthy to highlight the case of Clifford Brandt, a well-known businessman. He is also the son of one of the richest families in Haiti. Arrested for kidnapping in 2012, he was sentenced this year to spend 18 years in prison, after a long trial that lasted 4 years. He was identified as the closest friend of Olivier Martelly, former president Joseph Martelly’s son.

Former US ambassador to Haiti, Mr. Brian Dean Curran, in his farewell speech before leaving the country, addressed the chamber of commerce in Haiti by saying: “Yes, well-known drug traffickers. They buy from your stores; you sell houses to them or build new ones. You take their deposits to your banks. You educate their children, and you elect them to positions in chambers of commerce.” In front of many businessmen of the country, Mr. Dean Curran denounced them how they have no respect for themselves by using “dirty money” to make profits. Here is a short prospect about the Haitian bourgeoisie: all deviant actions are welcome to make money including placing corrupted leaders to power.

When Jean B. Aristide got elected to power in 1991, his program was essential to fight inequality in Haiti. His government published a list of hundreds of businessmen who owed a lot of money to the state. Instead of starting to pay or make payment arrangements, they instead financed a multi-million dollar military coup against the elected and legitimate president (of course with CIA/state department’s help). The consequences were catastrophic: 5000 deaths and 100.000 refugees. Therefore, the private sector in Haiti is against progress and is indirectly fighting social stability. The business sector spent 13 years fighting each attempt to normalize the social and political situation.

The last successful attempt, supported by the Clintons, was to parachute Joseph Martelly in power--a man who admitted that he had been a drug addict/dealer; he was denounced as a spy for “FRAPPH”, a defunct terrorist organization known for its misogyny, brutality, and political assassination. While in power, Martelly conceded a contract to Tony Rodham, Hillary Clinton’s brother to exploit Haitian gold estimated at 25 billions of dollars. That is a typical case of the so-called “Pay to play” game. For five straight years, the former head of state looted public funds, “legalized drug trafficking”, promoted prostitution, domesticated public institutions at the highest level via bribes and huge kickbacks. Here we are enduring Martelly’s dire economic heritage: 3 billion US dollars debt, a 300 million US dollars budget deficit. Be it reminded that when Martelly got to the power in 2011, he found 1.9 billion dollars in the public treasure. Furthermore, the country had zero debt. Do the math! You will measure Martelly’s economic abyss’ dept. 

“The amalgamation of a failed private sector with kidnapping, drug trafficking, bad government constitutes the most important reason that explains Haiti’s failure in its quest to build a nation-state. Unfortunately, the United States government, symbol of nation building, is often on the wrong side of history in Haiti.”
Joel Leon

References:
CNBC, Jeff Cox: “US private sector created 216.000 jobs in November…” November 30th
Democratic Policy and Communications Center (DPCC)
www.Investopedia.com
International Trade Administration (ITA) – Haitian Hemispheric Opportunity through Partnership Encouragement Act 2006 HOPE I
Food conservation and energy Act of 2008, HOPE II
Haiti Lift Program Act 2010, HELP
Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act CBTPA
Center for Strategic and International Studies “The role of the Haitian Diaspora in building Haiti back better (June 24th, 2011)
Miami Herald “Cocaine Kingpin Jacques Ketant Back in Haiti”, Jacqueline Charles, August 18th, 2015
Haïti Express-News “ Haïti Mogul Drug Dealer, Jacques Ketant, Accueilli par Gracia Delva et Roro Nelson… » April 19th, 2015
Nouvelliste « Petro Caribe, Un Vaste Crime Économique », May 16th, 2016